Children are fluid when it comes to affection, notgender. It's just like it sounds. I'm outside of my belief-bubble. The question is, do I want to go back in? Can I go back? Does belief have a limit? Curiosity certainly tests our limits. Belief...is scrutiny; it's an egg shell. Don't live in a shell if you're afraid of the dark. Belief is an eggshell. Do you see the majesty? Intelligence is a curious field of study.
Children are fucking idiots. The temptation (by interested parties) to "fast-track" their education separates children from their innocence; in exchange to suit an agenda; that could not be executed successfully applied on to rational, critical-thinkers. Teachers are baby-sitting without the permission to discipline students for fear of termination. Let's talk about that shall we? Would you allow your child's teacher to reprimand as they see fit? You know why?
"If I can't hit my own child, no one else can."
We all know hitting doesn't solve anything. Unfortunately. We as parents cling to the hope that in our clenched fists lies the key to ending this infernal mischief (indefinitely). Children have no idea they have all the power (until someone with an agenda comes along to "incentivize" them). Your child's intrigue mingling with an authority figure who romanticizes identity. It's mischief on steroids. Parents are really just power of attorney until their kids are adults or go woke.
Teachers are fully aware of how stupid (and shitty) your children are. Expanding the curriculum (beyond the fundamentals of reason) helps to intrigue...the population into compliance. Titillating children through possibilities influenced by agendas from parties of interest. Ideas that haven't the moral brilliance and integrity to handshake a child's mind without warping their identity; that's the PARENT'S responsibility. Ha-ha. Educators romanticize identity.
You wish me to talk about incentive? Affection. Children are fluid when it comes to affection, notgender. Educators romanticize identity. To educate is to romance identity. This is my suspicion with gender theory...it's only ONE aspect of identity. But if gender is fluid, it's the romance of infinity. Let me tell you from experience (watch this trailer), infinity is a fucking lie.
The definition of affection or fondness is a "disposition or state of mind or body" that is often associated with a feeling or type of love. It has given rise to a number of branches of philosophy and psychology concerning emotion, disease, influence, and state of being.
Affection is a fluid interface encouraging identity to experiment with fundamental boundaries (like reason). Boundaries are not intended to topple. There is no guarantee affection is mutual. Think about that educators...it may cost you your job.